“Civilization creates discontents; barbarism creates quick endings” is a thought-provoking statement that explores the complexities of human societies and behaviors. At its core, this quote suggests that civilization and progress come with their own set of challenges – discontents, while barbarism leads to swift but often destructive outcomes.
Civilization refers to an advanced state of human society, where people live in organized communities with established laws, practices and cultural norms. However, this complexity often breeds discontent as individuals grapple with societal expectations, inequality, injustice or simply the monotony of routine life. This is not necessarily bad; it can lead to growth and change as people strive for improvement.
On the other hand, barbarism typically refers to primitive behavior characterized by violence or lack of understanding for cultural sophistication. The “quick endings” could refer to the immediate consequences or results achieved through such behavior – it might solve issues promptly but usually in a destructive manner.
Applying this idea to today’s world could reflect on how we deal with conflicts or problems at both global and personal levels. For instance, diplomatic negotiations (symbolizing civilization) might take longer time but potentially result in peaceful resolutions. Conversely, resorting to violence (symbolizing barbarism) may bring about an immediate end to conflicts but also cause devastation.
In terms of personal development too this idea holds relevance: patience through learning curves (civilized approach) versus seeking instant gratification (barbaric approach). Personal growth requires time and effort – there will be dissatisfaction along the way as one realizes their flaws or faces obstacles. However these ‘discontents’ are essential for self-improvement. On contrary if one seeks quick results without putting sufficient effort it might lead towards unfulfilling outcomes akin ‘quick endings’.
Thus Cooley’s quote essentially emphasizes on understanding different approaches towards problem-solving – each having its own merits & demerits depending upon context & desired outcomes.
