The quote emphasizes the idea that smaller teams can be more effective than large ones. When someone states they have a “very small team by choice,” it suggests a deliberate strategy: valuing quality, communication, and agility over sheer numbers. Large teams, like one with 55,000 people, can face challenges such as diluted accountability, difficulties in coordination, and slower decision-making processes. In contrast, smaller teams often foster closer relationships among members, promote clearer communication pathways, and enhance adaptability to changes or challenges.
In today’s world—especially in the realm of business—this approach is increasingly relevant. Many organizations are moving toward flatter structures that prioritize small cross-functional teams capable of rapid innovation. Startups often embody this idea; limited resources compel them to function efficiently without unnecessary complexity or bureaucracy.
Moreover, this concept extends beyond organizational dynamics into personal development as well. Individuals might consider focusing on cultivating a few significant relationships instead of trying to maintain numerous superficial connections. This could mean investing time in deepening skills with a few trusted mentors or collaborating closely with just a handful of peers for projects rather than spreading oneself too thin across many endeavors.
The notion also resonates in the context of productivity techniques—many advocate for focusing on fewer tasks but executing them at high quality rather than attempting to juggle too many responsibilities at once. Ultimately, embracing smaller scales allows for deeper engagement and meaningful outcomes both professionally and personally.