The quote suggests that indignation towards kitsch—art, decoration, or cultural artifacts deemed lowbrow or overly sentimental—is often rooted in a deeper frustration about the embracing of imitation rather than originality. Kitsch can be seen as a celebration of surface-level aesthetics and emotions that lack depth. When people express disdain for kitsch, they might be reacting to its perceived insincerity or lack of genuine creativity.
At its core, this statement points to a broader commentary on how society values authenticity and originality over imitation. However, it also reveals something paradoxical: the joy found in kitsch comes from its ability to connect with people on an emotional level, even if that connection is through something considered shallow or derivative.
In today’s world, where social media often promotes curated versions of life that can feel artificial or overly polished, this idea becomes particularly relevant. Many aspects of modern culture celebrate mimicry—whether it’s viral trends imitating popular dances or styles—or the reuse of older ideas in new contexts (like remakes in film). While some may criticize these trends as lacking substance or depth (the “indignation over kitsch”), others find joy and community within them.
From a personal development perspective, recognizing our own responses to imitation versus originality can lead to insight into what we value most. Embracing elements deemed “kitsch” might encourage individuals to explore their own creativity without fear of judgment. It suggests that there is value in enjoying things for what they are—joyful experiences—even if they don’t meet strict standards of artistic merit.
Ultimately, engaging with both original works and imitations allows us to appreciate various forms of expression and foster connections with others who share similar tastes. This balance between valuing authenticity while also finding pleasure in shared cultural moments can enrich our lives significantly.
