This quote suggests that peace can only be achieved and maintained when there is a strong deterrent force to prevent or discourage conflict. It implies that a civilized society must possess not only the desire for peace but also the capability to defend and enforce it. This warlike power does not necessarily mean physical or military power, but can also refer to economic, political, or diplomatic strength.
The quote further highlights the paradoxical nature of peace and power. It suggests that peace is not merely the absence of conflict, but a state that is actively maintained by the presence of power. It is a delicate balance between the capacity for war and the desire for peace. The power to wage war is thus not intended for destruction, but rather as a safeguard against it.
In today’s world, this idea can be seen in the concept of ‘peace through strength’, a principle that underpins many international relations strategies. Nations strive to build strong economies, advanced technologies, and powerful militaries not necessarily to wage war, but to deter aggression from others. The assurance of mutual destruction in case of a nuclear war, for example, has kept nuclear-armed nations from using these weapons against each other.
On a personal level, this quote can be applied to the concept of setting boundaries. Just as a country needs a strong defense to maintain peace, individuals need to establish and enforce their personal boundaries to maintain peace in their relationships. This ‘warlike power’ can be seen as the ability to say no, to stand up for oneself, and to defend one’s personal space and rights. It is only when these boundaries are respected can there be peace in interpersonal relationships.
