The quote suggests a strong connection between reading, writing, and the broader themes of humanity and conflict. At its core, it implies that engaging with literature and the act of writing are fundamentally humanizing activities. Those who don’t read might be seen as lacking in empathy or understanding—qualities that come from exposure to diverse perspectives and experiences found in books.
By stating that “it is better to write than to make war,” the quote contrasts the constructive nature of writing with the destructive nature of war. Writing can be a form of communication that fosters understanding, dialogue, and peace, while war typically leads to suffering and destruction. This highlights an important belief in art’s power: creative expression can serve as a tool for resolving conflict rather than escalating it.
In today’s world, this idea has significant relevance. In an age where information is consumed rapidly through social media rather than traditional reading, there’s concern about deeper critical thinking skills diminishing. The ability to write thoughtfully—whether through essays, blogs, or even social media posts—can still promote meaningful conversations about pressing issues such as inequality or climate change instead of resorting to violence or hostility.
On a personal development level, embracing reading encourages individuals to expand their worldview by exposing themselves to different cultures and ideas. Writing enhances one’s ability not only to articulate thoughts but also serves as a means for self-reflection and emotional processing. Both practices cultivate empathy; when people read stories from other perspectives or express themselves through writing, they learn about others’ struggles and triumphs.
Ultimately, this quote advocates for prioritizing intellectual engagement over aggression—encouraging us all towards more peaceful resolutions in conflicts we face personally or socially by harnessing our capacity for thoughtfulness through reading and writing.
