This quote suggests that the relationship between an artist and nature is dualistic. On one hand, the artist is the master of nature, capable of capturing, interpreting, and transforming the natural world through their artistic medium. They have the power to manipulate nature in their artwork, representing it in ways that can evoke certain feelings, thoughts, or reactions from the audience. They can choose what aspects of nature to highlight or hide, and how to portray them.
On the other hand, the artist is also a slave to nature. They are bound by the limitations of the natural world and the truths it holds. They can’t create something that is beyond the realms of nature or human understanding. Furthermore, they are often inspired or moved by nature, and in that sense, they are at its mercy. They rely on nature for their inspiration and creativity, making them dependent on it.
In today’s world, this idea is still very much applicable, not just to artists, but to anyone engaged in a creative process. For instance, a filmmaker or a photographer is a master in the sense that they can frame a shot, decide on the lighting, and manipulate images in post-production. Yet, they are also a slave to the real world, bound by the physical limitations of their subjects and the laws of physics.
In terms of personal development, this quote can be seen as a reminder of the balance between control and surrender. We have the power to shape our own lives, to make decisions that steer us in certain directions. Yet, we are also bound by the laws of nature and society, and by our own physical and mental limitations. Recognizing and accepting this dual role can lead to a more balanced, fulfilling life. It’s about knowing when to take charge, and when to let go and go with the flow.
